relieffoki.blogg.se - Duplicacy vs arq

#Duplicacy vs arq how to
#Duplicacy vs arq driver
#Duplicacy vs arq software
#Duplicacy vs arq series

My biggest concern was cost, and the primary driver for cost was going to be where to store the backups.

#Duplicacy vs arq series

Instead, it’s a series of smaller, modular elements that work together and can be replaced as needed. There’s no single key to the system and this is probably the way it should be.

As little as possible (< 10 hours/year).

How much touch-time did I want to put in to maintain the system:.

This could impact all devices in the region (~ 1000 km radius).

This could impact all devices within a given structure ( < ~ 1000 m radius).

hard drive failure, stupidity, file corruption, theft, etc)

What kind of disasters was I looking to mitigate:.

I was willing to lose up to one hour of data.

How recent I wanted the backups to be (put another way, how much time/effort was I willing to loose):.

Fremont: decommissioned in 2017, but < 20 GB at the time.

Atlas: While I have 12TB of usable space (of which I’m using 10TB), I only had about 7TB of data to backup.

I also had additional considerations I needed to keep in mind:

#Duplicacy vs arq software

…these would become my core requirements, in addition to also needing to understand how the backup software works (because of this I strongly prefer open-source). Replacing CrashPlan was hard because it has so many features for its price point, especially: This can be as simple as backing up your computer to two external hard drives - one you keep at home and backup to weekly and one you leave at a friends house and backup to monthly.

Arguably the best method is the 3-2-1-bang strategy: “ three total copies of your data of which two are local but on different mediums (read: devices), and at least one copy offsite.” Bang represents inevitable scenario where you have to use your backup.

#Duplicacy vs arq how to

Important Things In A Backup System 3-2-1-Bangįirst a quick refresher on how to backup. Your new subscription expiration date is.

… To allow you time to transition to a new backup solution, we’ve extended your subscription (at no cost to you) by 60 days. This means that over the next 14 months we will be exiting the consumer market and you must choose another option for data backup before your subscription expires. We have shifted our business strategy to focus on the enterprise and small business segments. In terms of pure data storage cost this was $0.000625/GB/month 2, which is an order of magnitude less than Amazon Glacier’s cost of $0.004/GB/month 3.Īnd then one year ago CrashPlan announced: This all worked great because CrashPlan offered a (frankly) unbelievably good CrashPlan+ Family Plan deal that allowed up ten computers and “unlimited” data - which CrashPlan took to mean somewhere around 20TB of total backups 1 - for $150/year. Additionally, they also backup to Atlas using CrashPlan’s handy peer-to-peer system.īrother and Mom are extended family member’s laptops that just backup to CrashPlan Cloudįremont is the web server (decommissioned recently though), it used to backup to CrashPlan as well. I also care about that data and they also backup to CrashPlan Cloud. It backs up its data to CrashPlan Cloud.Īndrew and Rachel are the laptops we have.

The most recently incarnation of my backup strategy was centered around CrashPlan and looked something like this:Ītlas is my NAS and where a bulk of the data I care about is located. Having a backup of your data is important, and for me it’s taken several different forms over the years - morphing as my needs have changed, as I’ve gotten better at doing backups, and as my curiosity has compelled me.įor various reasons that will become clear, I’ve iterated through yet another backup system/strategy which I think would be useful to share. This post seems to be older than 4 years-a long time on the internet.